REVIEW: AUTOart 60th Anniversary "James Bond - Goldfinger" • DiecastSociety.com

REVIEW: AUTOart 60th Anniversary “James Bond – Goldfinger”

Goldfinger – imagine the first brass tunes as an entry fanfare to this 60th Anniversary Edition of James Bond´s Aston Martin DB 5, the definitive Bond car, brought up from AUTOoart´s golden-era-vault, of course no longer re-issued in precious metal, but today´s composite. For comparison, I cannot offer AUTOart´s original issue of Sean Connery´s ride, but only the civilian, non-gadgeted diecast version in silver. Has AUTOart struck gold with it?

First ignoring Q´s modifications for a comparison of the DB5 renditions, the most obvious difference of the new DB 5 (or DB 5 Continuation, as Aston Martin, who offers modern replicas too) is of course weight. The tone of silver on the new car seems warmer, a more gilded hue of silver than the old diecast´s. The body is more sharply sculpted, particularly notable at the C-pillar, where the raised shoulder line dops a little inward, creating a “ditch” unlike on the old model. A welcome addition is the two wing mirrors, an antenna stub and two chrome knobs in the rear windows rear corners, indicating the original´s opening function.

The winged Aston badges rear and front were flat photoetched pieces, whereas the new car has 1mm-thick plastic badges. The nose and radiator grille are more curved than the new one, and the bonnet´s air scoop opening is now thinner. Headlights behind their glass covers stick out a little further and are more detailed than on AA´s previous model and the indicators´ clear lenses have become smaller although they hide Q´s deadliest addition. Bond´s new Aston has a curvier front bumper than the vintage AUTOart, while that has the rear bumper´s corners sticking out further, seeming more massive on the rear corners. The new taillights are far superior to the old ones, offering the layered structure of the lenses and duly deleting the visible mounting pins. Sadly, but correctly the new movie car has no DB5 logos on the boot lid or the fenders, but an added “GB” nationality sticker for its continental journey.

More differences can be seen on the wheels. While both have wire spokes, the new one´s wires retract inwards from the outside of the rims, protruding from there much further outward to culminate in a three-winged spinner, whereas the old DB5 ´s spokes emerge towards a two-wings-spinner much less dramatically. The addition of branding the tires as “Avon Turbospeed” lay due testament to what has become state of the art since. If, however, we look at shut-lines on doors, bonnet and trunk, the original promise of composite´s superiority AUTOart justified its departure from diecast metal with does not exactly prove a game changer. In this respect, the old model holds up extremely well.

“A spider´s touch” that Shirley Bassey attributes to Goldfinger in her famous Bond title song is recommended when operating the delicate parts of any composite AUTOart, but even more so on this model. There are reports on bonnets and doors not fitting too well or mounting screws loose and falling out, luckily not on mine. Opening both “Superleggera”-scripted bonnets on their forward hinges, both models offer two metal prop rods to keep it open. Comparing the engines to pictures of the 1:1, the new model again proves more accurate. Just mind the more correct air filter in the front right corner, the red radiator fan, added wiring and generally increased depth.

The cabin has also become more refined, even without considering Q´s added gadgets. The seats are deeper, more sculpted, and the steering wheel´s wood is more credible. This finally brings us to Q´s little party tricks without which the cabin seems rather empty by modern standards. Some secret extras aren´t concealed, like the open tracking radar screen. Others cannot really be operated, like the famous ejection seat: Yes, you can add and remove both the roof panel and the seat, which are held in place magnetically, but you cannot flip up the top of the delicate gear lever to reveal the red button or send the seat flying (a fun offered on the rather good Playmobil Bond-Aston). The “spider´s touch” comes into play again for all the other gadgets, with meticulous instructions on how to operate them, like accessing the telephone receiver in the door card or flipping the armrest open for the switch buttons that operate the exterior stealth, weapons and defence systems.

Most of those are hidden away extremely well by the model, with the bullet-proof shield that can really come up from the trunk lid being an inevitable exception. Inside the trunk, AUTOart has replicated all the switchboards, wiring and tanks that fictionally drive the gadgets. The overriders on the bumpers and tire-slashing spinners on the wheels readily slide out, without that option being obvious when retracted. You wouldn´t assume that the number plates actually rotate (although the GB sticker somewhat blows the conspirative cover of the Aston being registered in France or Switzerland) The last thing you´d expect, though, when looking at the model is that the indicator lenses will flip open to reveal extendable machinegun barrels in the front and (fictitiously) squirt slippery oil in the rear.

“Golden words he will pour in your ear. But his lies can’t disguise what you fear.” Well, I hope that doesn´t apply to my review and pictures will lay sufficient testament to this being absolute gold, even though admittedly fears that re-releases are not always better are usually not unjustified. This, however, can be deemed superior to its predecessor, especially earlier Bond-versions and worth adding to any Aston Martin, movie car or James Bond collection, having the license to thrill. Not only, but particularly in this 60th-Anniversary-007-Goldfinger version, AUTOart has added a “Midas touch” that surely earns it a nomination for our 2024 Model-of-the-Year-Awards.

Written by

12 Responses to "REVIEW: AUTOart 60th Anniversary “James Bond – Goldfinger”"

  1. DS Team says:

    Thank you for this review. Both the street and Golffinger additions crossed our path over the last month. No time to review either. We’ll definitely consider this replica for the 2024 DS Model of the Year.

  2. Mr Anderson says:

    I pre ordered mine a few months back. Received it last week. I absolutely love it. The detail is fantastic! Astonished how the gadgets are so cleanly integrated into the model. Practically indistinguishable from its normal road version.

    Autoart really did well on this one. I highly recommend it to anyone who wants to add it to their collection. If I could include a pic of where mine sits, I would. 🙂

    • Karsten says:

      Mine is displayed with a Martini glass, the above figure and a silcenced PPK/S replica. If a picture is somewhere online, you could provide a link.

  3. Kostas says:

    Thank you Karsten for the very nice review! Very well written, presented and great pictures too!

  4. Vitaliy D says:

    Great review!

    And I even had a chance to compare the spokes of the wheels in this AutoArt’s model vs. the spokes in a CMC’s model. While AutoArt’s spokes are definitely thicker than the CMC’s ones, the truth is that CMC’s spokes are actually too thin when comparing to the real things. In fact, the spokes’ thickness must be somewhere in the middle of the AutoArt’s and CMC’s versions, at least in case of the spokes of Aston Martin DB5.

    In terms of shutlines, and it’s about the doors, hood and trunk, in fact a metal die-cast Bentley Continental GT3-R by Almost Real (which was produced about 7 years ago, by the way) has better shutlines than this latest Aston Martin by AutoArt. Which obviously ruins the myth of achieving better shutlines with composite materials.

    • spikyone says:

      Agree completely on the spokes, so many CMCs with wire wheels look wrong because they’re too spindly.

      I’ll take issue with your last statement though. You can’t draw conclusions from a sample of 1 diecast/1 composite. As an engineer I can assure you that tolerances and sharpness of edges can both be improved with plastics compared to diecast metal (unless you machine the diecast, which virtually never happens), and they are the things that feed into panel gap appearance. I would bet that the actual edges of the panels on the AR are more rounded than on this AM. Also don’t forget that you’re comparing a 1960s car to a 2010s car – the real things will have very different fit and finish and a real DB5 will have bigger panel gaps.

      • Peter says:

        Exactly. Why do people expect tight shutlines on a 1960s car? Knowing how good they are on Autoart’s models of modern cars I bet they did that intentionally. Because that’s what they’re supposed to do.

      • Vitaliy D says:

        Hmm, looking at the photos of the real Aston Martin DB5 (e.g. in Wikipedia and in James Bond Wiki), the shutlines are actually very good and tight.
        I can also add that the bumper guards being hollowed above the bumper do not reflect the reality as well. The part above the bumper is expected to be sealed.
        Apart from that, I should say it would be a Signature line model if it was made from metal back in the past. And I’d additionally notice the unique door hinges on this model – I haven’t seen such hinges before.

  5. Mike D says:

    Peter

    AGREED indeed. The obsessive anti composite group will never change their opinions. I have several AUTOART examples in composite – excellent products. AND their paint will never rash lol.
    PS: A couple of my CMCs are starting to show show very minor paint rash – yikes…

  6. Karsten says:

    Thank you very much, everyone, for appreciating my review and efforts to capture the model photographically. I wish you all a Merry Christmas !

Leave a reply