The McLaren F1 is often heralded as one of the greatest supercars of all time. Launched in 1992, it was the brainchild of Gordon Murray, McLaren’s chief engineer, and featured a revolutionary design that prioritized lightweight construction, aerodynamic efficiency, and cutting-edge technology. The F1 was the first production car to use a carbon-fiber monocoque chassis, and its naturally aspirated 6.1-liter BMW V12 engine could produce 618 horsepower.
One of the most iconic aspects of the F1 was its unique three-seat layout, with the driver positioned in the center. This configuration maximized visibility and control, giving the car a distinctive and cockpit-like feel. Only 106 units were ever built, including prototypes and race cars, making it a rare and coveted vehicle among collectors.
The XP5, one of the five prototypes, played a crucial role in the development of the F1 and was the car that set a world speed record for production cars in 1998, reaching 240.1 mph. The McLaren F1 remained the fastest naturally aspirated car for over two decades, a testament to its groundbreaking engineering and performance.
Today, the McLaren F1 is more than just a car; it’s a symbol of innovation and a cornerstone in the history of high-performance automotive design. Owning a scale model of this masterpiece, especially a prototype like the XP5, is a way to celebrate one of the finest examples of automotive engineering.
The McLaren F1 is a car that needs no introduction, but the model manufacturer, LCD Model, might deserve one. In their latest release, LCD tackles the legendary McLaren F1, presenting the XP5 Experimental Prototype. This model features fully opening parts with a metal exterior and plastic components, along with a collection of accessories—including luggage sets for both the right and left storage compartments. Inside the box, LCD includes tools such as screwdrivers for detaching the model from its base, alongside various bits for access.
This review marks the first since evaluating the budget-friendly McLaren 600LT and the magnificent Pagani Zonda Barchetta. The McLaren F1 carries high expectations, but does it maintain LCD’s trajectory of offering excellent value and superb execution? Let’s dive in.
From an exterior standpoint, LCD Model has done a remarkable job of capturing the spirit of the McLaren F1. While I wouldn’t claim to be an authority on McLaren’s history or its various iterations, the model bears a striking resemblance to the AUTOart release. The only noticeable difference is a decal located on the rear’s lower side, showcasing the “XP5 Experimental Prototype” insignia, a nice touch that adds an extra layer of authenticity to this specific variant.
The green exterior colour beautifully complements the elegant lines of the McLaren F1. If subtlety and understatement are your preference, this colour is a great choice. LCD has also made improvements over their pre-production samples, especially when it comes to the car’s stance—a critical point that needed addressing.
The fit and finish are generally good, though not flawless. Comparing it side-by-side with the AUTOart version, I noticed that AUTOart boasts tighter panel gaps. However, this isn’t a significant issue unless you’re prone to nitpicking. The machining on the LCD version’s driver-side door could be better, as it leaves something to be desired. Nonetheless, these small shortcomings don’t detract from the overall impressive execution.
LCD has faithfully recreated the openable features, particularly the headlights and front compartment, with meticulous attention to detail. While it mirrors AUTOart’s work quite well, one difference is that AUTOart has gone the extra mile by adding wiring components for an even more authentic appearance. This omission by LCD doesn’t significantly detract from the model but is worth mentioning for those who are sticklers for intricate details.
The wheels and brake calipers are another highlight, showcasing the care LCD put into these components. Although there’s no tire badging on either the LCD or AUTOart models, this omission is consistent between the two brands.
Around the rear, the fully meshed grilles and precise badging give the model a clean, high-quality look. One issue reported by the model’s owner was that a few parts had come loose during shipping, including the center tunnel when accessing the engine bay. However, these issues were easily fixed, though it’s worth cautioning collectors to be careful when handling the model, especially when opening the glass-like panel.
Accessing the engine compartment and panels is a visual delight. The level of detailing is astonishing, and while some reports mention issues with the gold foil peeling on other examples, the unit reviewed here had no such problems. Everything fit well and looked immaculate.
When comparing the LCD and AUTOart versions, both models offer an equally compelling experience. That said, the compartments on the AUTOart model are slightly easier to access, and the tail spoiler lifts higher than on the LCD version.
Interior storage is limited on the McLaren F1, with only the two side-access panels. LCD ensures these compartments are functional, flocked, and well-executed, something AUTOart didn’t manage to match. However, AUTOart compensates by including more refined luggage pieces. The LCD effort is good but lacks the polish of AUTOart’s luggage details.
As for the interior itself, LCD may not have gone to the same extremes they did with their McLaren 600LT model, but it’s still comparable to AUTOart in most areas. One notable difference is that the LCD’s up-swinging doors are more elaborate, giving a better view of the car’s internal engineering. The seats also mimic Alcantara, thanks to LCD’s use of textured materials—a feature AUTOart doesn’t include. Did we mention the functional sun-visor? See the photos below.
In summary, the LCD Model McLaren F1 is a stellar addition to the brand’s lineup. When compared to the AUTOart version, it stands on equal footing in terms of quality and craftsmanship. Priced around $269 USD, the LCD version offers incredible value, especially since AUTOart’s model is now out of production and often priced artificially high. LCD has provided a worthy alternative, and for many collectors, it will be more than enough to satisfy their desire for a detailed McLaren F1 model.
The XP5 prototype label alone might be reason enough to add this one to your collection. In my opinion, it’s a must-have. Enjoy the pics!
Excellent review and pictures! For someone who doesn’t own the Autoart version, LCD is a great alternative.
Thanks for the feedback and letting the team borrow your model for review here. Yes, the LCD version is more than capable and the price is more attractive than AUTOart too.
Thank you for the excellent review and for the in depth information about the LCD McLaren F1. I am considering getting one and your review helped a lot. I agree, LCD produced a very well made model car with a lot of details inside and out and the classic dark green colour looks gorgeous!
Looks lovely and nice to hear thoughts from someone who by the sounds of it owns the Autoart version. The only thing that worries me about this model is the rear lights. From the looks of the pictures and the video, the brake lights aren’t level with one another and this issue seems to be pretty common from what I’ve seen from other collectors who have been able to source one. Which is surprising given my personal experience with LCD.
This wasn’t noticed when examining the model. I can definitely see your point, and photos don’t lie!
Lovely model but I just can’t ‘unsee’ the too large mclaren logo. Bothers me far more than it should.
There are just some things one can’t overlook.
Thank you for this meticulous review. Especially the detailed comparison to the Autoart is very reassuring to its lucky owners like myself.
Yes, we see no need to upgrade unless the XP5 prototype appeals to expanding a McLaren collection.
I’ve been collecting 1/18 models since the scale first appeared. My first McLaren F-1 was made by Maisto, and I eventually replaced it with one by AutoART. Splendid model, and looks great in black. Not many more vehicles I’m waiting for. I’m very selective.
Thank you for the thorough review and so many beautiful photos. I got the model in my hands a couple days ago and I am really happy with the purchase. It is a truly decent alternative to Autoart models, and given that it is the XP5 prototype version in british racing green color, it makes it a unique addition to any collection.
Can you define or elaborate on what makes this XP5 Prototype different from the production version? TIA.
What a brilliant article. Thanks for this DS. LCD’s is an amazing release… but how DS mentions… if you are already owning the AA, no need to add another LCD. Agree to this 100%. AA even though released it ages ago, still manages to hold on to its value position despite a very strong challenge from a newbie! Hats off to AA for this. On the other hand why XP5 is important? Number of reasons…. 1. this was one of the 5 prototypes that led to the creation of one of the greatest automobile in production version. 2. McLaren retained only this XP5 and this became the press car, allowing almost every known car magazine to feature this model with the plate K8 MCL. Arguably the most photographed F1 ever? 3. This car broke the speed car record for naturally aspirated production vehicle and held on to it for decades. Isnt that just wow? I am keeping my LCD along with my AA. Point :)
Well, regarding to the actual diecast model, I was just referring to the configuration of dark green color for the car and grey interior plus the side decals. For me it is an important element contrary to the more conventional colors configured by other manufacturers.
A beautiful and accurate review, beautiful car model.
I’m especially interested in the photo number 40, where there is a strut (or prop) that supports the engine cover.
On an AutoArt 1:18 McLaren F1 road version, the small plastic part of the engine cover, to which the strut was connected, initially had had a crack and then eventually become completely broken. I was so mad at AutoArt for that, that I have sold that model.
Then I bought AutoArt 1:18 McLaren F1 Grand Turismo – and that model initially had a crack in the small plastic part at the bottom of the strut – i.e. at the opposite side, comparing to the previous road version. So I tried to carefully secure that crack with some glue, hoping that it would help.
You know, when I experienced such a problem for the first time, it might be just a rare unluck. But when I faced almost the same problem for the second time, I could find a better explanation than a rare stupudity of AutoArt’s engineers.
Now, I’m very interested in how good this exact place has been engineered by LCD Models?
Looking forward to add this LCD to compliment my Autoart. I hope they can fix the small niggles in what otherwise is a very good model. Those misaligned rear lights are an irritant and the brush plates on the underside of the front bumper look tacky. They seem to have been just stuck there as an afterthought.
Nice review!
Am I the only one that’s noticed that LCD have misspelt the word “prototype” on the side decals? 🤦
Now that you’ve mentioned it, I can’t unsee it anymore.
Unfortunately a very common issue when these Chinese model brands don’t have proper native English speaking people involved in the development process!
I remember when I picked up on Almost Real’s mistake on the calipers of the Mercedes AMG GT-R. They wrote “carbon famic” instead of “carbon ceramic” – at least they corrected it in the future production runs after I made them aware of it.
+1!
I´m I the only one that noticed you´ve misspelled the word ´misspelt´? Sorry, this one was just too priceless.
Anyway, very good eye for detail to notice this. That´s more important than spelling when discussing model cars. Especially when it´s about spelling!
The way that deep, glossy green contrasts with the engine bay’s gold plating… priceless. But i guess the “Protoype” was a prototype of the actual Prototype.
Fortunately, there are many collectors of scale models in Ukraine, so I had a chance to inspect the green 1:18 McLaren F1 by LCD in flesh.
While inspecting the model closely, it is absolutely obvious that its moulds were based on AutoArt’s one. And, unfortunately, the LCD’s model inherits the very same weekness that irritates me so much in the AutoArt’s model: I clearly observed a white crack in a black _plastic_ jut (or lug), to which the engine cover’s strut (or prop) is connected. Oh my God! This is the third model with the very same defect that I saw by my own eyes! That’s the consequence of a bad engineering decision of using a small plastic part where a metal part should ne used.
Inspecting further, I noticed a lot of tiny things where LCD’s model is not that refined as the original AutoArt’s model. It’s about really tiny things such as less accurate or less detailed small photo-edged parts, or less accurate or less detailed small parts such as internal lamps above the passengers’ seats.
But given the price, it’s a very good model.
And I’d like to mention two places where the LCD’s model outperforms the AutoArt’s one:
1. The doors are opened really widely, much wider than on the AutoArt’s models, whether we are talking about the original 1:18 F1 or about any modern 1:18 McLaren by AutoArt. Given that LCD seems to use the same accurate hinges as AutoArt, it is amazing that LCD has achieved much wider opening angle.
2. The interior with soft materials a-la alcantara look really good. The seats from hard plastic that look like hard plastic were one of my concerns to the original 1:18 F1 by AutoArt. Now we have this LCD’s model with much more interesting surface of the seats and the torpedo, while AutoArt still prefers hard plastic in interiors of its modern models.
I’m almost sure the mentioned crack happens on the factory while a small screw is being screwed into the small plastic jut.
Even in this situation, I believe the crack could be avoided by making the initial hole (for the screw) a little more bigger in the plastic jut, and then by using a few milligrams of glue to ensure the screw is safely fixed in the hole.
I believe the approach I have just described would probably increase the price of the model by around 1-2 cents. Seems like a great solution to be considered by the factory.